4.8 Article

Urban water crises driven by elites' unsustainable consumption

期刊

NATURE SUSTAINABILITY
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 929-940

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-023-01100-0

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the past 20 years, over 80 metropolitan cities worldwide have faced severe water shortages due to droughts and unsustainable water use. Future projections are even more alarming, with urban water crises expected to worsen and disproportionately affect socially, economically, and politically disadvantaged populations. This study demonstrates the role of social inequalities in these crises, highlighting the implications of water overconsumption by privileged social groups and individuals.
Over the past two decades, more than 80 metropolitan cities across the world have faced severe water shortages due to droughts and unsustainable water use. Future projections are even more alarming, since urban water crises are expected to escalate and most heavily affect those who are socially, economically and politically disadvantaged. Here we show how social inequalities across different groups or individuals play a major role in the production and manifestation of such crises. Specifically, due to stark socioeconomic inequalities, urban elites are able to overconsume water while excluding less-privileged populations from basic access. Through an interdisciplinary approach, we model the uneven domestic water use across urban spaces and estimate water consumption trends for different social groups. The highly unequal metropolitan area of Cape Town serves as a case in point to illustrate how unsustainable water use by the elite can exacerbate urban water crises at least as much as climate change or population growth. Urban water crises, due to droughts and unsustainable water consumption, are becoming increasingly recurrent in metropolitan cities. This study shows the role of social inequalities in such crises, revealing the implications of water overconsumption by privileged social groups and individuals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据