4.8 Article

High-Efficiency Low-Lead Perovskite Photovoltaics Approaching 20% Enabled by a Vacuum-Drying Strategy

期刊

SMALL METHODS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smtd.202300202

关键词

low-lead perovskites; thermal stability; two-step fabrication; vacuum treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a vacuum-drying strategy in the two-step method was employed to fabricate low-lead perovskite solar cells with an impressive efficiency of 19.67%. The vacuum treatment induced the formation of low crystalline Pb0.3Sn0.7I2 films containing less solvent, thereby facilitating FAI penetration and suppressing pinholes. Compared to the conventional one-step method, the two-step fabricated low-lead perovskite films with vacuum-drying treatment exhibited larger grain size, lower trap density, weaker recombination loss, resulting in better thermal stability and a record-high efficiency near 20%.
Lead-tin mixed perovskites are excellent photovoltaic materials that can be used in single- or multi-junction perovskite solar cells (PSCs). However, most high-performance Pb-Sn mixed PSCs reported to date are still Pb-dominant. It is highly demanding to develop environmentally friendly low-lead PSCs, but the poor film quality caused by the uncontrollable crystallization kinetics has been hindering the efficiency improvement of low-lead PSCs. Here, a vacuum-drying strategy in the two-step method to fabricate low-lead PSCs (FAPb(0.3)Sn(0.7)I(3)) with an impressive efficiency of 19.67% is employed. The vacuum treatment induces the formation of low crystalline Pb0.3Sn0.7I2 films containing less solvent, thus facilitating the subsequent FAI penetration and suppressing pinholes. Compared with the conventional one-step method, the two-step fabricated low-lead perovskite films with the vacuum-drying treatment exhibit a larger grain size, lower trap density, and weaker recombination loss, thus giving rise to a record-high efficiency near 20% with better thermal stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据