4.8 Article

A smart polymer electrolyte coordinates the trade-off between thermal safety and energy density of lithium batteries

期刊

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
卷 58, 期 -, 页码 123-131

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2023.03.013

关键词

High energy density lithium battery; Safety characteristic; Smart polymer electrolyte; Thermal shutdown; Water-scavenging ability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, a smart polymer electrolyte is developed through in-situ radical random polymerization of monomers. It provides a balance between thermal safety and energy density of lithium batteries by creating a highly crosslinking network. The polymer electrolyte exhibits superior performance in terms of both thermal shutdown and cycle performance due to enhanced interface compatibility and water-scavenging ability.
In this article, we develop a smart polymer electrolyte through in-situ radical random polymerization of the cyclic carbonate urethane methacrylate monomer and the 2-isocyanatoethyl methacrylate monomer, which coordinates the trade-off between thermal safety and energy density of lithium batteries. It is demonstrated that the as-developed polymer electrolyte can incur the battery thermal shutdown before reaching the thermal runaway temperature. This originates from the highly crosslinking network caused by the nucleophilic addition of carbamate to isocyanate in the polymer matrix under the elevated temperature exceeding 170 degrees C. Besides, superior cycle performance of 4.5 V-class LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2/Li batteries can be achieved, with a capacity retention of 80% after 200 cycles at 0.5 C and 30 degrees C, owing to enhanced interface compatibility of this polymer electrolyte. Noting that this polymer electrolyte possesses a superior water-scavenging ability, which helps improve the moisture resistance and battery cycle performance. Impressively, this polymer electrolyte can achieve improved energy density and superior safety characteristic of lithium batteries under high cut-off voltage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据