4.7 Review

A Systematic Review of Consensus Mechanisms in Blockchain

期刊

MATHEMATICS
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math11102248

关键词

blockchain; BFT; business intelligence; distributed systems; hybrid consensus mechanisms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since the birth of Bitcoin, blockchain has evolved from a critical cryptocurrency technology to an enabling technology, revolutionizing fields requiring credibility and high-quality data for decision making. In business intelligence and business process management, users can build their blockchain-enabled collaboration and data-sharing ecosystem. This paper presents the development process of blockchain and introduces important consensus mechanisms, providing a comparison and analysis of these mechanisms to lay a foundation for selecting appropriate consensus mechanisms for different scenarios and application fields.
Since the birth of Bitcoin, blockchain has shifted from a critical cryptocurrency technology to an enabling technology. Due to its immutability and trustworthiness, blockchain has revolutionized many fields requiring credibility and high-quality data for decision making. Particularly in business intelligence and business process management, users can use blockchain to build their blockchain-enabled collaboration and data-sharing ecosystem with their partners. In this paper, we present the development process of blockchain and consensus mechanisms, where important blockchain consensus mechanisms are introduced. The consensus mechanism is the kernel among various blockchain components to ensure security and performance. Again, we present a comparison of these consensus mechanisms from different perspectives. We take the blockchain-enabling business as an example and analyze the relationship between blockchain and business process characteristics and the ideas and principles for selecting consensus mechanisms. Finally, we describe the differences and connections among many consensus mechanisms while laying a foundation for selecting appropriate consensus mechanisms for different scenarios and fields of application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据