4.7 Article

Stochastic Finite Element Analysis of Plate Structures Considering Spatial Parameter Random Fields

期刊

MATHEMATICS
卷 11, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math11112535

关键词

stochastic finite element method; plate structure; Kirchhoff plate; Mindlin plate; KL expansion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For plate structures, their random parameters can be considered as a two-dimensional random field in the plane. An efficient strategy for the stochastic finite element method was adopted to solve the plate theory considering the two-dimensional random field. The stochastic finite element method was used to establish the plate structural model and the point estimate method was applied to calculate the statistics of random structures. The proposed method can provide help in solving static problems of plate structures.
For plate structures, their random parameters can be regarded as a two-dimensional random field in the plane. To solve the plate theory considering a two-dimensional random field, an efficient strategy for the stochastic finite element method was adopted. Firstly, the stochastic finite element method was used to establish the plate structural model, in which the random field characteristics of the parameter were considered, and the mathematical expression of its random field was obtained through the Karhunen-Loeve expansion; secondly, the point estimate method was applied to calculate the statistics of random structures. The computational efficiency can be significantly improved through the reference point selection strategy. The accuracy and efficiency of the calculation strategy were verified, and the influences of correlation length and coefficient of variation of the parameter on the random response of plate structures under different plate types (including Kirchhoff plate and Mindlin plate) and boundary conditions (including simply supported and clamped supported) were discussed. The proposed method can provide some help in solving static problems of plate structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据