4.7 Article

Credibilistic Cournot Game with Risk Aversion under a Fuzzy Environment

期刊

MATHEMATICS
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math11041029

关键词

Cournot game; risk aversion; credibility theory; optimistic value criterion; (a(1, )a(2))-optimistic equilibrium quantity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The classic Cournot game neglects the impact of players' psychological behavior and cannot handle game problems with fuzzy information. To address this, a credibilistic Cournot game is developed, using the optimistic value criterion derived from credibility theory to describe manufacturers' risk-averse behavior and fuzzy variables to characterize associated parameters. The (alpha(1), alpha(2))-optimistic equilibrium quantity concept is proposed and its uniqueness is shown. The results demonstrate that manufacturers' (alpha(1), alpha(2))-optimistic equilibrium quantity is positively related to competitors' risk aversion level and negatively related to their own risk aversion level.
The classic Cournot game ignores the influence of the players' psychological behavior on the decision and cannot deal with the game problem of fuzzy information. To address such game situations, a credibilistic Cournot game is developed, where the optimistic value criterion derived from credibility theory is used to describe risk-averse behavior of manufacturers and the associated parameters are characterized by fuzzy variables. Then, a concept of the (alpha(1), alpha(2))-optimistic equilibrium quantity is proposed and its uniqueness is shown. Finally, the relevant results of the credibilistic Cournot game are applied to an example to illustrate the availability of our model, and a sensitivity analysis of the relationship between the (alpha(1), alpha(2))-optimistic equilibrium quantity and confidence levels is performed. The results show that manufacturers' (alpha(1), alpha(2))-optimistic equilibrium quantity is positively related to the risk aversion level of their competitors and negatively to their own risk aversion level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据