4.7 Article

The Effects of Dynamic Absorptive Capacity on Innovation Strategy: Evidence from SMEs in a Technological Context

期刊

MATHEMATICS
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math11102366

关键词

dynamic; absorptive capacity; strategy; technological; innovation; SMEs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Absorptive capacity and innovation strategies are determining factors for the survival of organizations. A quantitative study of 51 SMEs found a high correlation between absorptive capacity and innovation strategies. Despite working with advanced technologies, firms in this specific sector still face challenges in developing absorptive capacity for effective implementation of innovation strategies.
Absorptive capacity and innovation strategies are determining issues for the survival of organizations in current contexts. While organizations are immersed in the knowledge society, managers face great challenges to respond to market needs and performance in innovation ecosystems. This article aims to analyze the effects of absorptive capacity on the implementation of innovation strategy. A quantitative research study was conducted with a sample of 51 SMEs, and the construct model was analyzed using the SEM method. The results indicate that there is a high correlation between the level of absorptive capacity and innovation strategies. Even though firms in this specific sector work with advanced technologies, there is a basic level of development of absorptive capacity, generating some difficulties for the design and implementation of innovation strategies. Furthermore, by using the acquisition, assimilation, transformation, and exploitation of knowledge from the competitive landscape, firms improve their adaptability in the technological environment. The effects of absorptive capacity on innovation strategy contribute to the development of the extant literature on innovation management strategy and provide some managerial implications and future research areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据