4.7 Article

An Assessment of Marine Heatwaves in a Global Eddy-Resolving Ocean Forecast System: A Case Study around China

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jmse11050965

关键词

marine heatwave; eddy-resolving ocean forecast system; the China Sea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assesses the forecasting ability of the LICOM Forecast System (LFS), a global eddy-resolving ocean forecast system, for marine heatwaves (MHWs) in October 2021 around China. The LFS accurately predicts up to 79% of observed MHWs, with the highest skill during initial and decay periods. The forecasted duration and intensity of the MHW event align with observations, but with some deviations in specific regions.
Marine heatwaves (MHWs) are becoming increasingly frequent and intense around China, impacting marine ecosystems and coastal communities. Accurate forecasting of MHWs is crucial for their management and mitigation. In this study, we assess the forecasting ability of the global eddy-resolving ocean forecast system LICOM Forecast System (LFS) for the MHW events in October 2021 around China. Our results show that the 1-day lead forecast by the LFS accounts for up to 79% of the observed MHWs, with the highest skill during the initial and decay periods. The forecasted duration and intensity of the MHW event are consistent with observations but with some deviations in specific regions of the Yellow and South China seas. A detailed analysis of the heat budget reveals that the forecasted shortwave radiation flux is a key factor in the accuracy of the forecasted MHW duration and intensity. The oceanic dynamic term also greatly contributes to the accuracy in the southern Yellow Sea. In addition, the increasing bias of the forecasted duration and intensity with lead time are mainly caused by the underestimated shortwave radiation. Our findings suggest that improving the accuracy of oceanic dynamic processes and surface radiation fluxes in the LFS could be a promising direction to enhance the forecasting ability of marine extreme events such as MHWs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据