4.5 Article

Uniform and fast switching of window-size smectic A liquid crystal panels utilising the field gradient generated at the fringes of patterned electrodes

期刊

LIQUID CRYSTALS
卷 43, 期 6, 页码 735-749

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02678292.2016.1142012

关键词

Smectic A liquid crystal; field gradient effect; scattering; patterned electrodes

资金

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/F00897X/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/F00897X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F00897X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method to enable smectic A (SmA) liquid crystal (LC) devices to switch uniformly and hence fast from the clear state to a scattered state is presented. It will allow the reduction of the switching time for a SmA LC panel of 1 x 1 m(2) changing from a clear state to a fully scattered state by more than three orders to a few tens of milliseconds. Experimental results presented here reveal that SmA LC scattering initiates from the nucleated LC defects at the field gradient of the applied electric field usually along the edges of the panel electrode and grows laterally to spread over a panel, which takes a long time if the panel size is large. By patterning the electrodes in use, it is possible to create a large number of field gradient sites near the electrode discontinuities, resulting in a uniform and fast switching over the whole panel and the higher the pattern density the shorter the panel switching time. For the SmA LC panels used here, the ITO transparent electrodes are patterned by laser ablation and photolithography. It is shown that the defect nucleation time is much shorter than the growth time of the scattered region, hence it is possible to use the density of the field gradient sites to control the uniformity and switching time of a panel. Furthermore, the patterned SmA panels have a lower switching voltage than that of the non-patterned ones in general. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据