4.7 Article

Dual-Layer Distributed Optimal Operation Method for Island Microgrid Based on Adaptive Consensus Control and Two-Stage MATD3 Algorithm

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jmse11061201

关键词

island microgrid; offshore renewable energy; optimized scheduling; consensus control; deep reinforcement learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a novel dual-layer distributed optimal operation methodology for managing multiple controllable distributed fuel-based microturbines in island microgrids. The proposed method effectively reduces the operating costs of island microgrids, unifies the operational status of microturbines, and achieves plug-and-play capability.
Island microgrids play a crucial role in developing and utilizing offshore renewable energy sources. However, high operation costs and limited operational flexibility are significant challenges. To address these problems, this paper proposes a novel dual-layer distributed optimal operation methodology for islanded microgrids. The lower layer is a distributed control layer that manages multiple controllable distributed fuel-based microturbines (MTs) within the island microgrids. A novel adaptive consensus control method is proposed in this layer to ensure uniform operating status for each MT. Moreover, the proposed method can achieve the total output power of MTs to follow the reference signal provided by the upper layer while ensuring plug-and-play capability for MTs. The upper layer is an optimal scheduling layer that manages various forms of controllable distributed power sources and provides control reference signals for the lower layer. Additionally, a two-stage twin-delayed deterministic policy gradient (MATD3) algorithm is utilized in this layer to minimize the operating costs of island microgrids while ensuring their safe operation. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed methodology can effectively reduce the operating costs of island microgrids, unify the operational status of MTs, and achieve plug-and-play capability for MTs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据