4.7 Article

Hydrodynamic Loads on a Group of Six Structures of Different Cross-Sections in Uniform and Sheared Flow

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jmse11020383

关键词

hydrodynamic forces; vortex-induced loads; uniform flow; planar sheared flow; drag coefficient; lift coefficient

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the hydrodynamic forces on structures with different cross-sectional shapes in a flow field. The effects of changing cross-sectional shapes on flow profiles are examined through numerical simulations. The results show that the drag on upstream structures increases, while the drag on mid- and downstream structures decreases compared to circular cylinders. Additionally, the third cross-sectional shape exhibits higher drag compared to the others.
The estimates of hydrodynamic forces for a group of structures represent a challenge for the design of offshore systems, as they are subject to changes with a variation in flow profiles. The fluctuating effects may be more pronounced or, on the contrary, suppressed if the cross-sectional shape of structures in an array is altered. The present work performs a series of 2D numerical simulations for the flow past six identical stationary cylinders of three distinct geometrical shapes arranged in a 2 x 3 matrix configuration. The flow profiles considered have an averaged velocity corresponding to the critical flow regime of a Reynolds number of 2.5 x 10(5). The detached eddy simulation k-omega SST turbulence model is employed to perform a comprehensive investigation of the fluid force coefficients, their frequencies and vortex formation patterns. The effect of the spacing ratio varied simultaneously among the structures from 2 to 7 is considered in conjunction with the change in the flow profile and the cylinders' cross-section. The results of simulations show a higher mean drag on the upstream cylinders, reduced mean drag on the mid- and downstream cylinders with the second cross-sectional shape, and a higher mean drag on the cylinders with the third cross-sectional shape, compared to the original circular cylinders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据