4.7 Article

Assessment of Using Artificial Neural Network and Support Vector Machine Techniques for Predicting Wave-Overtopping Discharges at Coastal Structures

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jmse11030539

关键词

artificial neural network; support vector machine; prediction; wave-overtopping; sensitivity analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates artificial neural network-based approaches for estimating wave-overtopping discharge at coastal structures without a berm, using the newly developed EurOtop database. The GRNN model yields highly accurate results compared to other models.
Coastal defence structures play a crucial role in protecting coastal communities against extreme weather and flooding. This study investigates artificial neural network-based approaches, such as multilayer perceptron neural network (MPNN), cascade correlation neural network (CCNN), general regression neural network (GRNN), and support vector machine (SVM) with radial-bias function for estimating the wave-overtopping discharge at coastal structures featuring a straight slope 'without a berm'. The newly developed EurOtop database was used for this study. Discriminant analysis was performed using the principal component analysis method, and Taylor diagram visualisation and other statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the models. For predicting wave-overtopping discharge, the GRNN yielded highly accurate results. As compared to the other models, the scatter index of the GRNN (0.353) was lower than that of the SVM (0.585), CCNN (0.791), and MPNN (1.068) models. In terms of the R-index, the GRNN (0.991) was superior to the SVM (0.981), CCNN (0.958), and MPNN (0.922). The GRNN results were compared with those of the previous models. An in-depth sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the significance of each predictive variable. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis was conducted to select the optimal validation method for the GRNN model. The results revealed that both the validation methods were highly accurate, with the leave-one-out validation method outperforming the cross-validation method by only a small margin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据