4.6 Article

Mn-Fe Prussian blue analogue as low-cost robust cathode for non-aqueous Zn-ion batteries

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 34, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.105231

关键词

Manganese hexacyanoferrate; Prussian blue analogue; Zn-ion batteries; Non-aqueous electrolyte; Low-cost cathode

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, sodium manganese hexacyanoferrate (NaMnFe-PB) was reported as a cathode material for Zn-ion batteries. Its ease of synthesis, rigid open framework, and compositional and electrochemical tunability make it an attractive low-cost Mn-Fe-based compound.
Zn-ion batteries (ZIBs) are one of the most promising alternatives for large-scale energy storage systems due to two-electron transfer capability, safety, low toxicity, and low cost. However, most of the cathode materials reported for non-aqueous ZIBs still show unsatisfactory electrochemical performance. To overcome this, factors such as type of crystal structure, transition metal-ion coordination, and nature of the d orbitals being filled must be taken into consideration in the design of suitable host materials. Herein, we report the use of a Prussian blue analogue, sodium manganese hexacyanoferrate (NaMnFe-PB), as cathode in ZIBs. Its ease of synthesis, rigid open framework, and compositional and electrochemical tunability make this low-cost Mn-Fe-based compound highly attractive. The strong interactions among the two redox centers MnIII/MnII, FeIII/FeII, and C N- ligand allow two close voltage plateaus at similar to 1.50 V vs Zn/Zn2+, delivering a capacity of 89.5 mAh g(-1). Ex-situ X-ray absorption and diffraction techniques confirm the high redox reversibility and structural stability of NaMnFe-PB upon divalent guest insertion. The Fe(CN)6 vacancies and coordinated water in the host lattice are believed to facilitate cation diffusion. The insight gained in this work may pave the way for the design of low-cost cathode materials for next -generation large-scale energy storage systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据