4.7 Review

Has new rural pension system reduced the intake of junk food among rural older adults? Evidence from China

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1131337

关键词

new rural pension system; dietary health; junk food; income shock; fuzzy regression discontinuity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, China is experiencing rapid growth in junk food consumption, but there is little previous evidence on the impact of endowment insurance on dietary health. This study uses data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) in 2014 to investigate the causal effect of the New Rural Pension System (NRPS) on the intake of junk food among rural older adults in China. The results show that the NRPS significantly reduces junk food intake, and this finding is robust across various tests. Furthermore, heterogeneity analysis reveals that certain groups, such as females, individuals with low education, unemployed individuals, and low-income groups, are more sensitive to the pension shock from the NRPS.
At present, China has become one of the fastest growing countries in terms of junk food consumption. However, there has been less previous evidence for the effect of endowment insurance on dietary health. Using the data China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) from 2014, this paper exploits a policy, the New Rural Pension System (NRPS), that only the older adults who have reached 60 years old can receive pensions and conduct a fuzzy regression discontinuity (FRD) to address endogeneity and examine the causal effect of the NRPS on the intake of junk food among rural older adults in China. We find that the NRPS can significantly reduce junk food intake among them, which remains robust after a series of robustness tests. In addition, heterogeneity analysis shows that the female, low-educated, unemployed, and low-income groups are more sensitive to the pension shock from the NRPS. The result of our study provides insights to effectively improve people's dietary quality and related policy formulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据