4.5 Article

Turnover and Natal Dispersal in the Finnish Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) Population

期刊

DIVERSITY-BASEL
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/d15040567

关键词

raptor ecology; breeding dispersal; microsatellites; mtDNA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estimating turnover in a population provides information on population dynamics, such as dispersal and mortality. By studying genetic diversity and population structure in the Finnish golden eagle population, we found no notable changes in genetic diversity during the 15-year study period and did not discover any population structure. We also examined the turnover rate and found a rate of 23%, which correlated with the breeding success of the previous year.
Estimating turnover in a population provides information on population dynamics, such as dispersal and mortality. Dispersal increases genetic diversity and affects the genetic structure. Golden eagles are monogamous, tend to mate for life, and have strong nest site fidelity, which suggests low turnover rates. Here, we first studied genetic diversity and population structure in the Finnish golden eagle population using 11 microsatellite loci and a fragment of a mitochondrial DNA control region. We found no notable changes in genetic diversity during the 15-year study period and did not discover any population structure. Then, we examined the turnover rate using chick genotypes (N = 935) by estimating relatedness between chicks born in the same territory in different years. The results showed a turnover rate of 23%, which correlated with the breeding success of the previous year. Similarly, in the absence of turnover, the pair changed nest sites within a territory after an unsuccessful breeding. In addition, our dataset also revealed natal dispersal of ten individuals. Natal dispersal distance was 110 km on average (median 98 km); however, the distance seemed to vary depending on geographical location, being greater in Northern Finland than in Southern Finland.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据