4.4 Article

Confinement Potential in a Soft-Wall Holographic Model with a Hydrogen-like Spectrum

期刊

UNIVERSE
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/universe9030114

关键词

AdS; QCD; heavy-quark potential

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the application of the soft-wall holographic model in QCD, demonstrating that it can successfully reproduce not only the linear Regge spectrum, but also the linear plus Coulomb confinement potential similar to the Cornell potential. This property can be interpreted as a holographic counterpart of the hadron string picture, where the linearly rising potential and Regge-like spectrum are directly related.
It is well known that the soft-wall holographic model for QCD successfully reproduces not only the linear Regge spectrum, but also, via the holographic Wilson confinement criterion, the linear plus Coulomb confinement potential, which is similar to the Cornell potential. This property could be interpreted as a holographic counterpart of the hadron string picture, where the linearly rising potential and Regge-like spectrum are directly related. However, such a relation does not exist in the bottom-up holographic approach. Namely, the Cornell-like potentials arise in a broad class of bottom-up holographic models. The standard soft-wall model is merely a particular representative of this class. This fact is relatively unknown, so we provide a comprehensive discussion of the point. As an example, we consider a soft-wall-like model with linear dilaton background in the metric. This model leads to a hydrogen-like spectrum. A linear plus Coulomb confinement potential within this model is calculated. The calculation of renormalized potential at short distances turns out to be complicated by a new subtlety that was skipped in general discussions of the issue existing in the literature. However, the confinement potential of the model is shown to be not very different from the potential obtained in the standard soft-wall model with a quadratic background.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据