4.7 Article

Application of net zero extended exergy buildings concept for sustainable buildings analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
卷 68, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106095

关键词

Net-zero energy building; Exergy; Extended exergy; Net-zero extended exergy; Exergetic footprint

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Different definitions of Zero-Energy Building (ZEB) have been proposed, including zero energy, zero carbon, zero exergy, and zero cost. This study introduces the concept of net zero extended exergy buildings, which combines extended exergy and net zero exergy building concepts to measure the exergetic footprint. The proposed methodology is applied to a building, and the results indicate the required peak power and electrical energy for meeting the electricity demand.
Different Zero-Energy Building (ZEB)-related definitions considering its four main dimensions, such as zero energy, zero carbon, zero exergy and zero cost, have been proposed by different investigators. Among these, exergy-based definitions are relatively low in numbers. In this regard, the main objective of this present study is to propose net zero extended exergy buildings as a new concept, which combines extended exergy and net zero exergy building concepts and is a measure of the exergetic footprint. This concept setups a balance between extended exergy accounting of electricity from the grid and electricity generated in building. The proposed methodology is applied to a building available in the literature for heating and cooling seasons. Results show that 450Wp peak power and 44.181 kWh electrical energy must be obtained for meeting the electricity demand of the building. Another novel result is that the extended exergy accounting of the electricity generated by PV panels is bigger than the extended exergy of the electricity taken from the gird meaning that exergetic footprint of the electricity generated by PV panels is bigger. However, this result must be interpreted for the whole life time of the system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据