4.6 Article

Plasma Fibrinogen as a Predictor of Perioperative-Blood-Component Transfusion in Major-Nontraumatic-Orthopedic-Surgery Patients: A Cohort Study

期刊

DIAGNOSTICS
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13050976

关键词

anesthesia; blood transfusion; blood-coagulation tests; fibrinogen; orthopedic surgeries

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to assess the association between preoperative fibrinogen levels and perioperative blood-product transfusion in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. The results showed that there was no association between preoperative fibrinogen levels and the need for blood transfusion.
There is a trend towards increased perioperative bleeding in patients with plasma fibrinogen levels < 200 mg/dL(-1). This study aimed to assess whether there is an association between preoperative fibrinogen levels and perioperative blood-product transfusion up to 48 h after major orthopedic surgery. This cohort study included 195 patients who underwent primary or revision hip arthroplasty for nontraumatic etiologies. Plasma fibrinogen, blood count, coagulation tests, and platelet count were measured preoperatively. A plasma fibrinogen level of 200 mg/dL(-1) was the cutoff value used to predict blood transfusion. The mean (SD) plasma fibrinogen level was 325 (83) mg/dL(-1). Only thirteen patients had levels < 200 mg/dL(-1), and only one of them received a blood transfusion, with an absolute risk of 7.69% (1/13; 95%CI: 1.37-33.31%). Preoperative plasma fibrinogen levels were not associated with the need for blood transfusion (p = 0.745). The sensitivity and the positive predictive value of plasma fibrinogen < 200 mg/dL(-1) as a predictor of blood transfusion were 4.17% (95%CI: 0.11-21.12%) and 7.69% (95%CI: 1.12-37.99%), respectively. Test accuracy was 82.05% (95%CI: 75.93-87.17%), but positive and negative likelihood ratios were poor. Therefore, preoperative plasma fibrinogen level in hip-arthroplasty patients was not associated with the need for blood-product transfusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据