4.6 Article

Analysis of Positive Results of F-18-FDG PET/CT Imaging after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Lymphoma

期刊

DIAGNOSTICS
卷 13, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13122027

关键词

lymphoma; SCT; post-transplantation F-18-FDG PET; CT; Deauville score; false-positive FDG uptake

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to differentiate false-positive from true-positive positron emission tomography (PET) results after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) for lymphoma involvement by analyzing clinical variables and specific imaging features. The associations and significance of PET positivity and clinical information were assessed, and survival probabilities were compared. False-positive PET results were common, and several variables could help differentiate false-positive from true-positive post-SCT PET results.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to differentiate between false-positive and true-positive positron emission tomography (PET) results after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) for lymphoma involvement by analyzing several clinical variables and specific imaging features. Patients and Methods: Patients with lymphoma who received SCT and underwent post-transplantation F-18-FDG PET/CT scans between January 2013 and April 2021 at our institution were included. Associations between PET positivity and related clinical information were assessed using t-tests and & chi;(2) tests. The significance of variables differentiating benign lesions from malignant FDG-avid lesions was evaluated by logistic regression analysis. Survival probabilities were derived from Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using the log-rank test. Results: A total of 185 patients (235 post-transplantation PET/CT scans) were enrolled in our present study. Compared with those with true-positive PET results, patients with false-positive PET results exhibited a better prognosis. For the autologous SCT group, false-positive cases were more commonly seen when FDG-avid foci appeared outside the sites of the original disease (p = 0.004), and the integrated CT imaging showed negative results (p = 0.000). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, integrated CT results were the only significant factor. For the allogeneic SCT group, false-positive cases were significantly more commonly seen when DS = 4 (p = 0.046), FDG-avid foci appeared outside the sites of the original disease (p = 0.022), and the integrated CT imaging showed negative results (p = 0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, whether FDG-avid foci were in the sites of the original disease and integrated CT results were both significant factors. Conclusion: False-positive FDG uptake in post-transplantation PET was not uncommon. Several variables could provide an important reference to differentiate false-positive from true-positive post-SCT PET results for lymphoma involvement. Trial registration number: ChiCTR2300067355.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据