4.6 Article

Comparative Study of Sorbents for Spray Dry Scrubbing of SO2 from Flue Gases

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 8, 期 26, 页码 23401-23411

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c00064

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the absorption of SO2 from flue gases using three different sorbents in a spray dryer. The findings showed that trona had the highest SO2 removal efficiency of 94% at a temperature of 120℃ and a stoichiometric molar ratio of 1.5, compared to hydrated lime (82%) and limestone (76%).
This study presents the findings of an investigationinvolvingthe absorption of SO2 from flue gases, using three differentsorbents, in a spray dryer. Experimentation involved the evaluationof three sorbents, i.e., hydrated lime (Ca[OH](2)), limestone(CaCO3), and trona (Na2CO3 & BULL;NaHCO3 & BULL;2H(2)O), and their relevant properties, forflue gas desulfurization by spray dry scrubbing. Experiments wereconducted to explore the effects of spray characteristics in the spraydrying scrubber on SO2 removal efficiency using the selectedsorbents. The ranges of various operating parameters were considered,including the stoichiometric molar ratio of (1.0-2.5), theinlet gas phase temperature of (120-180 & DEG;C), and an inletSO(2) concentration of 1000 ppm. The use of trona gave betterSO(2) removal characteristics; a high SO2 removalefficiency of 94% was recorded at an inlet gas phase temperature of120 & DEG;C and a stoichiometric molar ratio of 1.5. Under the sameoperating conditions, Ca[OH](2) and CaCO3 gave82 and 76% SO2 removal efficiency, respectively. Analysisof the desulfurization products by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and Fouriertransform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy revealed the presence of CaSO3/Na2SO3, a product of the semidry desulfurizationreaction. A significant proportion of unreacted sorbent was observedwhen Ca[OH](2) and CaCO3 sorbents were used ata stoichiometric ratio of 2.0. Trona also gave the highest degreeof conversion (96%) at a stoichiometric molar ratio of 1.0. Ca[OH](2) and CaCO3 gave 63 and 59%, respectively, underthe same operating conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据