4.6 Article

Identification of Breast Cancer Subtypes by Integrating Genomic Analysis with the Immune Microenvironment

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c08227

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to identify breast cancer (BC) subtype clusters and crucial gene classifier prognostic signatures by integrating genomic analysis with the tumor immune microenvironment (TME). The results showed that TCGA-BC samples could be divided into three subtype clusters, with S2 having a poorer prognosis and S1 and S3 having better prognoses. Three key pathways and 10 crucial prognostic-related gene signatures were screened. Single-cell analysis revealed that S1 samples showed the most types of immune cells, S2 samples were more sensitive to tumor treatment drugs and enriched with more neutrophils, while more multilymphoid progenitor cells were involved in subtype cluster S3. The findings provide a basis for the clinical precision treatment of BC.
Objectives: We aim to identify the breast cancer (BC) subtype clusters and the crucial gene classifier prognostic signatures by integrating genomic analysis with the tumor immune microenvironment (TME). Methods: Data sets of BC were derived from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), METABRIC, and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. Unsupervised consensus clustering was carried out to obtain the subtype clusters of BC patients. Weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and univariate and multivariate regression analysis were employed to obtain the gene classifier signatures and their biological functions, which were validated by the BC dataset from the METABRIC database. Additionally, to evaluate the overall survival rates of BC patients, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was carried out. Moreover, to assess how BC subtype clusters are related to the TME, single-cell analysis was performed. Finally, the drug sensitivity and the immune cell infiltration for different phenotypes of BC patients were also calculated by the CIBERSORT and ESTIMATE algorithms. Results: TCGA-BC samples were divided into three subtype clusters, S1, S2, and S3, among which the prognosis of S2 was poor and that of S1 and S3 were better. Three key pathways and 10 crucial prognostic-related gene signatures are screened. Finally, single-cell analysis suggests that S1 samples have the most types of immune cells, S2 with more sensitivity to tumor treatment drugs are enriched with more neutrophils, and more multilymphoid progenitor cells are involved in subtype cluster S3. Conclusions: Our novelty was to identify the BC subtype clusters and the gene classifier signatures employing a large-amount dataset combined with multiple bioinformatics methods. All of the results provide a basis for clinical precision treatment of BC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据