4.6 Article

High-Temperature Syngas Desulfurization and Particulate Filtration by ZnO/Ceramic Filters

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c08260

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cleaning combustible gas at high temperatures can improve energy efficiency and reduce costs for power generation. A study on high-temperature desulfurization and particulate filtration of syngas using ZnO/R-CuO sorbents and ceramic filters has been carried out. The results show that the process is feasible and can achieve high efficiencies.
Combustible gas (e.g., gasification syngas) cleaning at high temperatures can obtain further gains in energy efficiency for power generation and importantly leads to a simplified process and lower cost as a commercially viable source of clean energy. Thus, a feasibility study for high-temperature desulfurization (HTDS) and additional high-temperature particulate filtration (HTPF) of a raw syngas using ZnO sorbent-dispersed Raney CuO (ZnO/R-CuO) and ceramic filter (ZnO/CF) has been carried out. By synchrotron X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy, mainly Zn(II) and Cu(II) are found in the ZnO/R-CuO sorbents. Both ZnO and R-CuO in the sorbents are involved in HTDS (1% H2S) at 873 K to form ZnS, Cu2S, and a small amount of CuS and reach relatively high HTDS efficiencies (82-90%). In addition, regeneration of the sulfurized sorbent by oxidation with O2 at 873 K (HTRG) for 1 h can restore ZnO and CuO for continuous and repetitive HTDS-HTRG cycles. To facilitate the HTDS engineering applications by the ZnO/R-CuO sorbents, their reaction rate constant (8.35 x 10(4) c(m3)/g/min) and activation energy (114.8 kJ/mol) at 873 K have also been determined. Furthermore, the ZnO/CF sorbent/filter can perform HTDS and additional HTPF at 873 K with very high particulate removal efficiencies (>98%). This demonstrates the feasibility for hot-syngas cleaning with a much better energy efficiency and lesser cost for cleaner power generation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据