4.7 Article

Analysis of Wheat Virome in Korea Using Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Platforms

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants12122374

关键词

plant virus; wheat; virome; high-throughput sequencing; nanopore sequencing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, wheat virome in three different geographical regions of Korea was investigated using ONT and Illumina sequencing. Five viral species, including newly identified SCYLV and WLYaV in Korean wheat samples, were identified. Both ONT and Illumina sequencing were reliable and powerful tools for detecting and identifying wheat viruses.
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the most important staple crops in the world, along with maize and rice. More than 50 plant viruses are known to infect wheat worldwide. To date, there are no studies on the identification of viruses infecting wheat in Korea. Therefore, we investigated virome in wheat from three different geographical regions where wheat is mainly cultivated in Korea using Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) sequencing and Illumina sequencing. Five viral species, including those known to infect wheat, were identified using high-throughput sequencing strategies. Of these, barley virus G (BVG) and Hordeum vulgare endornavirus (HvEV) were consistently present in all libraries. Sugarcane yellow leaf virus (SCYLV) and wheat leaf yellowing-associated virus (WLYaV) were first identified in Korean wheat samples. The viruses identified by ONT and Illumina sequencing were compared using a heatmap. Though the ONT sequencing approach is less sensitive, the analysis results were similar to those of Illumina sequencing in our study. Both platforms served as reliable and powerful tools for detecting and identifying wheat viruses, achieving a balance between practicality and performance. The findings of this study will provide deeper insights into the wheat virosphere and further help improve disease management strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据