4.7 Review

Occurrence of Alkenylbenzenes in Plants: Flavours and Possibly Toxic Plant Metabolites

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants12112075

关键词

alkenylbenzenes; safrole; estragole; methyleugenol; myristicin; apiol; herbs; essential oils; culinary spices

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alkenylbenzenes are natural secondary plant metabolites, some of which are proven genotoxic carcinogens. This review provides an overview of the occurrence of potentially toxic alkenylbenzenes in essential oils and extracts used for flavoring purposes in food. It focuses on well-known genotoxic alkenylbenzenes like safrole, methyleugenol, and estragole, but also considers other alkenylbenzenes commonly used for flavoring. The review emphasizes the need for quantitative occurrence data on alkenylbenzenes in plants and final plant food supplements, processed foods, and flavored beverages for more reliable exposure assessment in the future.
Alkenylbenzenes are naturally occurring secondary plant metabolites. While some of them are proven genotoxic carcinogens, other derivatives need further evaluation to clarify their toxicological properties. Furthermore, data on the occurrence of various alkenylbenzenes in plants, and especially in food products, are still limited. In this review, we tempt to give an overview of the occurrence of potentially toxic alkenylbenzenes in essential oils and extracts from plants used for flavoring purposes of foods. A focus is layed on widely known genotoxic alkenylbenzenes, such as safrole, methyleugenol, and estragole. However, essential oils and extracts that contain other alkenylbenzenes and are also often used for flavoring purposes are considered. This review may re-raise awareness of the need for quantitative occurrence data for alkenylbenzenes in certain plants but especially in final plant food supplements, processed foods, and flavored beverages as the basis for a more reliable exposure assessment of alkenylbenzenes in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据