4.7 Article

Updated Mineral Composition and Potential Therapeutic Properties of Different Varieties of Olive Leaves from Olea europaea

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants12040916

关键词

Olea europaea L; folium; inorganic composition; nutraceutical potential; intelligent bioactive compounds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the qualitative and quantitative composition of Olea europaea L. folium samples collected from different cultivars in Valpacos, Portugal. The mineral analysis showed that the olive leaf extracts could be a potential source of essential elements for addressing deficiencies in various disorders. Further research is needed to explore the nutraceutical potential of these cultivars for designing novel therapies.
Olea europaea L. folium has been studied for its potential nutraceutical properties. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted on samples of Madural, Verdeal, and Cobrancosa elementary leaves and leave sprouts (mamoes) collected in the region of Valpacos, Portugal. Mineral analysis determined the measurements of the levels of several macro- and micro-elements based on ICP-MS techniques. The inorganic analysis in this work allowed us to propose olive leaf extract (OLE) from different cultivars as a viable and affordable source of mineral substrates to address disorders related to essential elements such as Na, K, Mg, Ca, Mn, Fe, and Cu deficiencies. Given the importance of the research on novel therapies, finding a suitable substrate for extracting quality amounts of mineral is a priority. The physiological influence of enzymes dependent on minerals with regard to neuroinflammatory and neurobehavioral, metabolic, cardiovascular, osteodegenerative, anti-aging, pulmonary, and immunological defense disorders might dictate the importance of further research for designing supplementation based on the nutraceutical potential of OLE of these cultivars predominant in the northern region of Portugal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据