4.7 Review

The Lack of Standardization and Pharmacological Effect Limits the Potential Clinical Usefulness of Phytosterols in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants12081722

关键词

phytosterol; benign prostatic hyperplasia; sitosterol; campesterol; dietary supplement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) increases with age. Phytotherapeutic approaches have been developed due to the side effects of traditional medications, leading to the popularity of dietary supplements (DS) containing active compounds beneficial for BPH, such as phytosterols (PSs). However, the use of PSs in BPH is limited due to the lack of standardized extracts and experimental evidence.
The prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) markedly increases with age. Phytotherapeutic approaches have been developed over time owing to the adverse side effects of conventional medications such as 5-reductase inhibitors and alpha 1-adrenergic receptor antagonists. Therefore, dietary supplements (DS) containing active compounds that benefit BPH are widely available. Phytosterols (PSs) are well recognized for their role in maintaining blood cholesterol levels; however, their potential in BPH treatment remains unexplored. This review aims to provide a general overview of the available data regarding the clinical evidence and a good understanding of the detailed pharmacological roles of PSs-induced activities at a molecular level in BPH. Furthermore, we will explore the authenticity of PSs content in DS used by patients with BPH compared to the current legislation and appropriate analytical methods for tracking DS containing PSs. The results showed that PSs might be a useful pharmacological treatment option for men with mild to moderate BPH, but the lack of standardized extracts linked with the regulation of DS containing PSs and experimental evidence to elucidate the mechanisms of action limit the use of PSs in BPH. Moreover, the results suggest multiple research directions in this field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据