4.7 Article

SNP Diversity and Genetic Structure of Rogosija, an Old Western Balkan Durum Wheat Collection

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants12051157

关键词

durum wheat landraces; Rogosija; genetic diversity; UPOV descriptors; 25K Illumina SNP array; Western Balkan eco-geographic region

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Durum wheat landraces, such as Rogosija, are valuable genetic resources for identifying and isolating new genes and alleles that can enhance crop adaptability to climate change. In this study, the genetic diversity of the Rogosija collection was estimated using morphological descriptors and SNP array. The analysis revealed two distinct clusters, indicating the presence of two different Balkan durum landrace collections evolved in different eco-geographic micro-areas. The origins of Balkan durum landraces were also discussed.
Durum wheat landraces represent a genetic resource for the identification and isolation of new valuable genes and alleles, useful to increase the crop adaptability to climate change. Several durum wheat landraces, all denominated Rogosija, were extensively cultivated in the Western Balkan Peninsula until the first half of the 20th century. Within the conservation program of the Montenegro Plant Gene Bank, these landraces were collected, but without being characterized. The main goal of this study was to estimate the genetic diversity of the Rogosija collection consisting of 89 durum accessions, using 17 morphological descriptors and the 25K Illumina single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array. The genetic structure analysis of the Rogosija collection showed two distinguished clusters localized in two different Montenegro eco-geographic micro-areas, characterized by continental Mediterranean climate and maritime Mediterranean climate. Data suggest that these clusters could be composed of two different Balkan durum landrace collections evolved in two different eco-geographic micro-areas. Moreover, the origin of Balkan durum landraces is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据