4.6 Article

Determining representative pseudo-absences for invasive plant distribution modeling based on geographic similarity

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2023.1193602

关键词

species distribution modeling; biological invasion; pseudo-absence; absence; representation

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new method based on geographic similarity is proposed for obtaining pseudo-absence data. The results show that this method can improve model accuracy and provide valuable insights into improving invasive plant distribution predictions.
IntroductionThe use of pseudo-absence data constrained by environmental conditions can facilitate potential distribution predictions of invasive species. However, pseudo-absence data generated by existing methods are usually not representative because the relationship between the presence and pseudo-absence points is either simplistic or neglected. This could under or overestimate the potential distribution of invasive species. MethodsTo address this deficiency, this study proposes a new method for obtaining pseudo-absence data based on geographic similarities. First, the reliability of pseudo-absences was quantified based on the geographic similarity to the occurrence of species. Subsequently, a representative pseudo-absence reliability threshold interval was determined. Finally, different pseudo-absence acquisition methods were assessed by combining virtual species with a real invasive species. ResultsThe analysis demonstrated that the geographic similarity method can improve model accuracy and achieve a more realistic distribution compared with the traditional method of sampling for pseudo-absence data. DiscussionThis result indicates that the pseudo-absence data obtained using the geographic similarity approach were more representative. Our study provides valuable insights into improving invasive plant distribution predictions by considering the geographical relationships between species occurrences and the surrounding environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据