4.5 Article

Technical Pearls to Effectively Use 5-ALA in Fluorescence-Guided Tumor Resection-5 Lessons from the Operating Room

期刊

BRAIN SCIENCES
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13030411

关键词

5-ALA; gliomas; surgery; education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper summarizes the authors' institutional experience with 5-ALA-guided procedures over a decade and provides five surgical tricks to simplify the surgical workflow. The results include analysis of visualization, techniques to reduce residual risk, assessment of fluorescence levels, and analysis of false positive cases. The importance of 5-ALA employment is evaluated.
Background: Since its introduction in 2007 in Europe and in 2017 in the United States, 5-ALA has demonstrated an undisputed advantage in providing real-time tumor visualization. The aim of the present paper is to summarize our institutional experience over a decade of routine 5-ALA-guided procedures in order to provide five surgical tricks to ease surgical workflow. Methods: Data were collected from 822 patients diagnosed with histopathologically confirmed high-grade gliomas (HGG)-according to the WHO 2021 criteria-who underwent surgery at the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli between January 2012 and January 2022. Results: From our large institutional experience, the learned technical pearls were grouped in five distinct domains: 1. Analysis of visualization, overall workflow, and technical recommendations to improve intraoperative set-up; 2. Techniques to reduce the risk of inadvertent residuals and failure to evocate fluorescence; 3. Analysis of specific surgical conditions favoring remnants; 4. Assessment of different degrees of fluorescence and their surgical meaning; 5. Analysis of false positive cases. Conclusions: With all the limitations of a qualitative and retrospective analysis, this paper was specifically conceived as a vademecum for educational purposes to promote and maximize 5-ALA employment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据