4.5 Article

Cognitive Load Moderates the Effects of Total Sleep Deprivation on Working Memory: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials

期刊

BRAIN SCIENCES
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13060898

关键词

sleep deprivation; working memory; cognitive load; event-related potentials; electroencephalography; N-back

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to investigate the effects of 36 hours of total sleep deprivation on working memory under different load levels. The results showed that as the load increased, reaction time increased and accuracy decreased. The impairment of working memory due to sleep deprivation was more pronounced in high load conditions.
Purpose: The function of working memory (WM) is impaired by total sleep deprivation (TSD) and cognitive load. However, it is unclear whether the load modulates the effect of TSD on WM. We conducted a pilot study to investigate the effects of 36 h of TSD on WM under different load levels. Materials and methods: Twenty-two male students aged 18-25 years were enrolled, who underwent two types of sleep conditions (baseline and 36 h TSD), where they performed two N-back WM tasks (one-back task and two-back task) with simultaneous electroencephalography recordings. Results: Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that, with the increasing load, the reaction time increased and the accuracy decreased. After TSD, the correct number per unit time decreased. The significant interaction effect of the P3 amplitudes between the load level and the sleep condition showed that the reduction in the amplitude of P3 in the two-back task due to TSD was more obvious than that in the one-back task. Conclusions: Our results provided evidence for the moderation of load on the impairment of TSD on WM. The degree of TSD-induced impairment for a higher load was greater than that for a lower load. The current study provides new insights into the mechanisms by which sleep deprivation affects cognitive function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据