4.3 Article

Single-Fraction Radiation Therapy for Localized Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma

期刊

PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 346-350

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.03.015

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to investigate the treatment outcomes of single-fraction radiation therapy for CTCL. The results showed that single-fraction radiation therapy had a high rate of complete response and durable responses in the affected sites.
Purpose: Mycosis fungoides is the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Single-fraction radiation therapy has been used as a skin-targeted therapy to treat localized CTCL lesions. The objective of this study was to investigate the treatment outcomes associated with single-fraction radiation therapy for CTCL.Methods and Materials: We retrospectively studied the outcomes among patients with CTCL treated with single-fraction radiation therapy at our institution between October 2013 and August 2022. Clinical response (complete response [CR], partial response [PR], or no response [NR]) and retreatment response were evaluated. Results: A total of 242 lesions from 46 patients were analyzed, for an average of 5.3 lesions treated per patient. The majority of lesions presented with a plaque morphology (n = 145, 60.0%). All lesions were treated to a dose of 8 Gy in 1 fraction. Median follow-up was 24.6 months (range, 1-88 months). Of the 242 lesions, 36 (14.8%) had an initial PR or NR; all were retreated with the same regimen to the same site at a median interval of 8 weeks. Eighteen of the retreated lesions (50.0%) went on to have a CR. Thus, the overall CR rate for CTCL lesions was 92.6%. No recurrences were noted in the treated areas after achieving CR.Conclusions: Single-fraction radiation therapy to a dose of 8 Gy in 1 fraction to localized areas provided a high rate of complete and durable responses in the affected sites. & COPY; 2023 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据