4.6 Article

Comparison of Fecal Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Captive and Wild Asian Elephants

期刊

ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12050859

关键词

Elephas maximus; fecal microbial community; antibiotic resistance genes; wildlife conservation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compares the differences in gut bacterial diversity and antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) subtypes between captive and wild Asian elephants. The results show that the dominant species of gut bacteria differ between captive and wild elephants, leading to significant differences in ARGs. The study also reveals potentially pathogenic species in captive elephants and suggests that different food sources may affect bacterial communities and ARGs.
The Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) is a flagship species of tropical rainforests, and it has generated much concern. In this case, the gut bacterial communities of captive and wild Asian elephants are particularly noteworthy. We aim to compare the differences in bacterial diversity and antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) subtypes in fecal samples of Asian elephants from different habitats, which may affect host health. Analyses reveal that differences in the dominant species of gut bacteria between captive and wild Asian elephants may result in significant differences in ARGs. Network analysis of bacterial communities in captive Asian elephants has identified potentially pathogenic species. Many negative correlations in network analysis suggest that different food sources may lead to differences in bacterial communities and ARGs. Results also indicate that the ARG levels in local captive breeding of Asian elephants are close to those of the wild type. However, we found that local captive elephants carry fewer ARG types than their wild counterparts. This study reveals the profile and relationship between bacterial communities and ARGs in different sources of Asian elephant feces, providing primary data for captive breeding and rescuing wild Asian elephants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据