4.7 Review

Control of Beany Flavor from Soybean Protein Raw Material in Plant-Based Meat Analog Processing

期刊

FOODS
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods12050923

关键词

soybean protein; drying method; storage conditions; extrusion processing; interaction; beany flavor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of plant-based meat analogs is hindered by the beany flavor from raw soybean protein and extrusion processing. Understanding its formation and control is crucial for obtaining ideal flavor and maximizing food quality. This study examines the formation and influence of beany flavor during extrusion, discusses control methods, and proposes future research directions.
The development of plant-based meat analogs is currently hindered by the beany flavor generated by raw soybean protein and extrusion processing. Wide concern has led to extensive research on the generation and control of this unwanted flavor, as an understanding of its formation in raw protein and extrusion processing and methods through which to control its retention and release are of great significance for obtaining ideal flavor and maximizing food quality. This study examines the formation of beany flavor during extrusion processing as well as the influence of interaction between soybean protein and beany flavor compounds on the retention and release of the undesirable flavor. This paper discusses ways to maximize control over the formation of beany flavor during the drying and storage of raw materials and methods to reduce beany flavor in products by adjusting extrusion parameters. The degree of interaction between soybean protein and beany compounds was found to be dependent on conditions such as heat treatment and ultrasonic treatment. Finally, future research directions are proposed and prospected. This paper thus provides a reference for the control of beany flavor during the processing, storage, and extrusion of soybean raw materials used in the fast-growing plant-based meat analog industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据