4.7 Article

From Medical Herb to Functional Food: Development of a Fermented Milk Containing Silybin and Protein from Milk Thistle

期刊

FOODS
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods12061308

关键词

milk thistle; silybin; protein; NaHCO3 treatment; microbial fermentation; medical herb; functional foods

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to develop a fermented milk containing silybin and protein from milk thistle seeds. A three-step procedure was developed, including homogenization of seeds, NaHCO3 heat treatment, and microbial fermentation. The fermented milk had high yields of silybin and protein, making it a potential dietary supplement.
Milk thistle is a traditional medicinal herb. Silybin is a medicinal component found in the seed coat of milk thistle, which has liver-protective and anti-cancer properties. Conventional studies have focused on the extraction of silybin with organic reagents, which was inapplicable to the food industry. This study aims to develop a fermented milk containing silybin and protein from the milk thistle seeds. A three step procedure was developed, comprising homogenization of milk thistle seeds, NaHCO3 heat treatment, and microbial fermentation. The silybin was characterized by high performance liquid chromatography, and the protein was quantified and electrophorized. It was found that the homogenization step was essential for the preparation of protein, and the NaHCO3 heat treatment was the crucial step in obtaining silybin. The optimal NaHCO3 treatment settings were 1% NaHCO3, 60 degrees C, and 3 h, and the optimal strains for microbial fermentation were L131 (Rummeliibacillus stabekisii) and RS72 (Lactobacillus plantarum). The silybin yield in the fermented milk reached 11.24-12.14 mg/g seeds, accounting for 72.6-78.4% of the total silybin in the milk thistle seeds, and the protein yield reached 121.8-129.6 mg/g seeds. The fermented milk had a slightly sweet yoghurt-like flavor and could be used as a dietary supplement for silybin and protein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据