4.7 Article

The Development of a Digital Twin to Improve the Quality and Safety Issues of Cambodian Pate: The Application of 915 MHz Microwave Cooking

期刊

FOODS
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods12061187

关键词

microwave; heat transfer; mass transfer; Lewis analogy; Cambodian pate; 915 MHz

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the development of a digital twin model for the cooking process of a common food product in Cambodia - pate. The model accurately predicts the temperature and moisture changes in the pate. This is important for improving energy efficiency and food quality.
Foodborne diseases are common in Cambodia and developing good food hygiene practices is a mandatory goal. Moreover, developing a low-carbon strategy and energy efficiency is also a priority. This study focuses on pate cooking, a very common food product in Cambodia. In this paper, the authors chose to develop a digital twin dedicated to perfectly predict the temperature for cooking in a 915 MHz single-mode cavity, instead of using a classical and energy-consuming steaming method. The heating strategy is based on a ramp-up heating and a temperature-holding technique (with Tylose((R)) as the model food and Cambodian pate). The model developed with COMSOL (R) Multiphysics software can accurately predict both local temperatures and global moisture losses within the pate sample (RMSE values of 2.83 and 0.58, respectively). The moisture losses of Cambodian pate at the end of the process was 28.5% d.b (dry basis) after a ramp-up heating activity ranging from 4 to 80 degrees C for 1880 s and a temperature-holding phase at 80 degrees C for 30 min. Overall, the accurate prediction of local temperatures within Cambodian pate is mainly dependent on the external heat-transfer coefficient during the temperature-holding phase, and is specifically discussed in this study. A 3D model can be used, at present, as a digital twin to improve the temperature homogeneity of modulated microwave power inputs in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据