4.7 Article

Impacts of Electroextraction Using the Pulsed Electric Field on Properties of Rice Bran Protein

期刊

FOODS
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods12040835

关键词

rice protein; pulsed electric field; protein hydrolysates; antioxidant peptide; in vitro GI digestion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The application of pulsed electric field (PEF) can improve the extraction yield and properties of rice bran proteins from two rice varieties. Compared to conventional alkaline extraction, PEF treatment increased protein extraction efficiency by 20.71-22.8% (p < 0.05). The PEF treatment influenced changes in the secondary structures of rice bran proteins and significantly improved their functional properties.
The pulsed electric field (PEF) was applied to improve the extraction yield and properties of rice bran proteins from two rice varieties (Kum Chao Mor Chor 107 and Kum Doi Saket). As compared to the conventional alkaline extraction, PEF treatment at 2.3 kV for 25 min increased the protein extraction efficiency by 20.71-22.8% (p < 0.05). The molecular weight distribution detected by SDS-PAGE and amino acid profiles of extracted rice bran proteins was likely unchanged. The PEF treatment influenced changes in the secondary structures of rice bran proteins, especially from the beta-turn to the beta-sheet structure. Functional properties of rice bran protein including oil holding capacity and emulsifying properties were significantly improved by PEF treatments by about 20.29-22.64% and 3.3-12.0% (p < 0.05), respectively. Foaming ability and foam stability increased by 1.8- to 2.9-fold. Moreover, the in vitro digestibility of protein was also enhanced, which was consistent with the increment of DPPH and ABTS radical-scavenging activities of peptides generated under in vitro gastrointestinal digestion (37.84-40.45% and 28.46-37.86%, respectively). In conclusion, the PEF process could be a novel technique for assisting the extraction and modification of the protein's digestibility and functional properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据