4.7 Article

Statistical modelling of voluntary feed intake in individual Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.)

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2023.1127519

关键词

meal size; consumption; feed deprivation; growth; aquaculture; precision feeding; salmon; feed intake

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Precision feeding aims to provide optimal growth and performance for farmed animals while minimizing feed waste. This study examined the relationship between meals, feed deprivation time, and the feed consumed by Atlantic salmon post smolts. The results showed that the time between meals and the size of the previous meal significantly affected the feed intake in the following meal, suggesting the possibility of optimizing meal size.
Precision feeding aims to provide the correct amount of feed to farmed animals for optimal growth and performance and to avoid feed waste. However, knowledge underlying the meal-to-meal variability in voluntary feed intake of farmed species is still limited. This study examined the relationship between meals, feed deprivation time and the feed (pellets) consumed by Atlantic salmon post smolts. The data was collected from individual fish handfed to satiety without social interaction in three independent short-term (6-12 days) experiments. The fixed variables of our model (feed deprivation time (i.e., time between meals), number of pellets provided, day, previous meal size, and fish growth) explained most of the feed intake (number of pellets ingested) (R-2 0.68). Results show that fish ingested more pellets over the course of the trials as they grew, resulting in a positive correlation between feed intake and fish growth (final minus initial fish weight). The time between meals and prior meal size (the number of pellets ingested in the previous meal) significantly affected feed intake in the following meal. Our results suggest that it is possible to optimise meal size by considering the size of the previous meal and the time since it was given.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据