4.7 Article

Multi-specific effects of increasing T90 mesh size and amount in an Australian fish trawl

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2023.1196660

关键词

T90 codend; selectivity; bycatch and discards; fish trawl; lastridge rope

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Investigated the use of larger and more T90 meshes in an Australian fish-trawl codend to improve size selection and reduce discards of deepwater flathead. Larger-meshed codends caught fewer immature flathead but lost some larger fish. The discard percentage in this fishery is likely to remain high (>75%), and efforts to improve selection should consider other modifications besides codend changes.
Increases in the size and amount of meshes turned 90 degrees ('T90') in an Australian fish-trawl codend were investigated to improve the size selection of deepwater flathead Neoplatycephalus conatus and reduce discards. The conventional codend comprised 94-mm mesh throughout with normal orientation (diamond-shaped) in the posterior half but T90 in the anterior half ('half 94-mm T90' codend). Two new codends had 105-mm T90 mesh in the anterior section only ('half 105-mm T90') and throughout ('full 105-mm T90'). Both larger-meshed codends caught fewer immature deepwater flathead, but also lost some larger fish, especially the full 105-mm T90 codend, which had 80% more T90 meshes. The larger-meshed codends also allowed some discarded species to escape, but similarly affected other targets. Collected deepwater flathead morphological data support a T90 mesh size of similar to 100 mm in the anterior codend or similar to 94 mm throughout to maintain target sizes. However, irrespective of changes to codend meshes, owing to comparable inter-specific sizes and shapes, the discard percentage in this fishery will probably remain consistent at >75%, which is more than double the global average for fish trawls. Future efforts to improve selection in the fishery should consider modifications other than codend changes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据