4.7 Article

Significant wave height prediction based on deep learning in the South China Sea

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2022.1113788

关键词

significant wave height; South China Sea; deep learning; RNN; LSTM; GRU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the predictive performance of significant wave height (SWH) using recurrent neural network (RNN), long short-term memory network (LSTM), and gated recurrent unit network (GRU) is comprehensively analyzed by considering different input lengths, prediction lengths, and model complexity. The results show that the input length and prediction length have an impact on the SWH prediction, but longer input length and longer prediction length do not necessarily lead to better prediction performance. Moreover, the number of layers in the model does not always determine the prediction performance.
Significant wave height (SWH) prediction can effectively improve the safety of marine activities and reduce the occurrence of maritime accidents, which is of great significance to national security and the development of the marine economy. In this study, we comprehensively analyzed the SWH prediction performance of the recurrent neural network (RNN), long short-term memory network (LSTM), and gated recurrent unit network (GRU) by considering different input lengths, prediction lengths, and model complexity. The experimental results show that (1) the input length impacts the prediction results of SWH, but it does not mean that the longer the input length, the better the prediction performance. When the input length is 24h, the prediction performance of RNN, LSTM, and GRU models is better. (2) The prediction length influences the SWH prediction results. As the prediction length increases, the prediction performance gradually decreases. Among them, RNN is not suitable for 48h long-term SWH prediction. (3) The more layers of the model, the better the SWH prediction performance is not necessarily. When the number of layers is set to 3 or 4, the model's prediction performance is better.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据