4.7 Article

5α-Dihydrotestosterone enhances wound healing in diabetic rats

期刊

LIFE SCIENCES
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 67-75

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2016.03.019

关键词

5 alpha-Dihydrotestosterone; wound contraction; Skin stereological analysis; Mast cells; Antioxidant effect; Diabetes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wound healing involves a complex interaction between the cells, extracellular matrix and oxidative response. Aims: Analyze the effects of 5 alpha-Dihydrotestosterone (5 alpha-DTH) ointment in cutaneouswound healing by secondary intention in diabeticWistar rats. Main methods: Rats (302.23 +/- 26.23 g, n = 48) were maintained in cages with food and water ad libitum in accordance with the Guiding Principles in theUse of Animal Ethics Committee. Diabeteswas induced by intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin (60 mg/kg). Three skin wounds (12 mm diameter) were created on the animals' back, which were randomized into 6 groups according to the application received: VT group: Vehicle (lanolin), SA group: 0.9% saline solution, NC group: Non-diabetic, CP group: positive control (silver sulfadiazine 0001%), T1 group: Testosterone (10%), T2 group: Testosterone (20%) emulsified in lanolin. The applicationswere made daily within 21 days, and tissues from different wounds were removed every 7 days. Key findings: Both groups treatedwith testosterone (T1 and T2) showed a significantly higher proportion of type I and type III collagen fibers. Superoxide dismutase levels were significantly higher on days 7 and 14 in testosterone treated groups. Protein carbonyls and MDA were lower in both groups. Significance: We conclude that groups treated with 5 alpha-DTH showed a better healing pattern with complete wound closure, and proved to have a positive effect on themorphology of the scar tissue aswell as an antioxidant stimulating effect during secondhand intention skin wounds repair in diabetic rats. (c) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据