4.7 Article

Melatonin reverses morphine tolerance by inhibiting microglia activation and HSP27 expression

期刊

LIFE SCIENCES
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 38-43

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2016.03.032

关键词

Melatonin; Morphine tolerance; Intrathecal injection; Tail-flick latency; Antinociception; Neuroinflammation; Microglial activation; Heat shock protein 27

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST104-2314-B-281-001]
  2. Tri-Service General Hospital Songshang Branch
  3. National Defense Medical Center [103-11]
  4. Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan [CGH-MR-A10429]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Melatonin has been reported to attenuate opioid tolerance. In this study, we explored the possible mechanism of melatonin in diminishing morphine tolerance. Main methods: Two intrathecal (i.t.) catheters were implanted in male Wistar rats for drug delivery. One was linked to amini-osmotic pump for morphine or saline infusion. On the seventh day, 50 mu g of melatonin or vehicle was injected through the other catheter instantly after discontinuation of morphine or saline infusion; 3 h later, 15 mu g of morphine or saline was injected. The antinociceptive response was then measured using the tail-flick test every 30 min for 120 min. Key findings: The results showed that chronic morphine infusion elicited antinociceptive tolerance and upregulated heat shock protein 27 (HSP27) expression in the dorsal horn of the rat spinal cord. Melatonin pretreatment partially restored morphine's antinociceptive effect in morphine-tolerant rats and reversed morphine-induced HSP27 upregulation. In addition, chronic morphine infusion induced microglial cell activation and was reversed by melatonin treatment. Significance: The present study provides evidence that melatonin, acting via inhibiting morphine-induced neuro-inflammation, can be useful as a therapeutic adjuvant for patients under long-term opioid treatment for pain relief. (c) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据