4.7 Article

Rosmarinic acid inhibits poly(I:C)-induced inflammatory reaction of epidermal keratinocytes

期刊

LIFE SCIENCES
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 189-194

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2016.05.023

关键词

Inflammasome; Keratinocyte; Poly(I:C); Rosmarinic acid

资金

  1. Chungnam National University Hospital Research Fund
  2. Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HN12C0062]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Keratinocytes are the predominant cells in the epidermis, exerting their primary role of physical barrier through sophisticated differentiation process. In addition, keratinocytes contribute to the activation of innate immunity, providing the surveillant role against external pathogens. It has been known that chronic skin inflammatory disease such as psoriasis can be provoked by viral pathogens including double-stranded RNA. In this study, we demonstrated that rosmarinic acid (RA) has an inhibitory potential on inflammatory reaction induced by double-stranded RNA mimic poly(I:C) in epidermal keratinocytes. Main methods: We cultured human epidermal keratinocytes and induced inflammatory reaction by poly(I: C) treatment. The effect of RA on inflammatory reaction of keratinocytes was determined by RT-PCR and Western blot. Key findings: RA significantly inhibited poly(I: C)-induced expression of inflammatory cytokines including IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-8, CCL20, and TNF-alpha, and downregulated NF-kappa B signaling pathway in human keratinocytes. In addition, RA significantly inhibited poly(I: C)-induced inflammasome activation, in terms of secretion of active form of IL-1 beta and caspase-1. Furthermore, RA markedly inhibited poly(I: C)-induced NLRP3 and ASC expression. Significance: These results indicate that RA can inhibit poly(I: C)-induced inflammatory reaction of keratinocytes, and suggest that it may be a potential candidate for the treatment of psoriasis. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据