4.6 Article

The Impact of Metabolic Syndrome Components on Erectile Function in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

期刊

METABOLITES
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo13050617

关键词

erectile dysfunction; sexual dysfunction; type 2 diabetes mellitus; metabolic syndrome; hypertension; obesity; triglycerides; HDL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to examine the impact of metabolic syndrome and its components on the erectile function of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The results showed that metabolic syndrome was not associated with erectile dysfunction (ED) or its severity. However, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) was found to be associated with ED and erectile function scores.
Erectile dysfunction is commonly encountered in diabetic patients and in patients with metabolic syndrome; however, only a few studies have assessed patients with metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) regarding their sexual function. The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of metabolic syndrome and its components on the erectile function of T2DM patients. A cross-sectional study including T2DM patients was conducted from November 2018 until November 2020. Participants were evaluated for the presence of metabolic syndrome and their sexual function was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire. A total of 45 consecutive male patients participated in this study. Metabolic syndrome was diagnosed in 84.4% and erectile dysfunction (ED) in 86.7% of them. Metabolic syndrome was not associated with ED or ED severity. Among metabolic syndrome components, only high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) was associated with ED [x(2) (1, n = 45) = 3.894, p = 0.048; OR = 5.5 (95% CI: 0.890-33.99)] and with the IIEF erectile function scores (median 23 vs. 18, U = 75, p = 0.012). Multiple regression analyses showed that HDL was non-significantly associated with the IIEF erectile function scores. In conclusion, among T2DM patients HDL is associated with ED.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据