4.6 Article

Global and Partial Effect Assessment in Metabolic Syndrome Explored by Metabolomics

期刊

METABOLITES
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo13030373

关键词

multiblock; metabolomics; clinical data; global effect; partial effect; partial correlation; metabolic syndrome; NuAge cohort

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In nutrition and health research, untargeted metabolomics is analyzed together with clinical data to improve prediction and understanding of pathological status. This can be modeled using a multiblock supervised model, where different input data blocks are potential predictors of the outcome. Path diagrams can also be used to represent this configuration, allowing for accounting of block effects.
In nutrition and health research, untargeted metabolomics is actually analyzed simultaneously with clinical data to improve prediction and better understand pathological status. This can be modeled using a multiblock supervised model with several input data blocks (metabolomics, clinical data) being potential predictors of the outcome to be explained. Alternatively, this configuration can be represented with a path diagram where the input blocks are each connected by links directed to the outcome-as in multiblock supervised modeling-and are also related to each other, thus allowing one to account for block effects. On the basis of a path model, we show herein how to estimate the effect of an input block, either on its own or conditionally to other(s), on the output response, respectively called global and partial effects, by percentages of explained variance in dedicated PLS regression models. These effects have been computed in two different path diagrams in a case study relative to metabolic syndrome, involving metabolomics and clinical data from an older men ' s cohort (NuAge). From the two effects associated with each path, the results highlighted the complementary information provided by metabolomics to clinical data and, reciprocally, in the metabolic syndrome exploration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据