4.6 Article

Exploration of Blood Metabolite Signatures of Colorectal Cancer and Polyposis through Integrated Statistical and Network Analysis

期刊

METABOLITES
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo13020296

关键词

metabolomics; colorectal cancer; polyposis; network inference; mass spectrometry; multivariate data exploration; cancer metabolism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the association networks of serum metabolites and found that the metabolite-metabolite association network of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is distinct from that of patients with polyposis and healthy controls. Energy metabolism-related nodes play a crucial role in the CRC network.
Colorectal cancer (CRC), one of the most prevalent and deadly cancers worldwide, generally evolves from adenomatous polyps. The understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying this pathological evolution is crucial for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. Integrative systems biology approaches offer an optimal point of view to analyze CRC and patients with polyposis. The present study analyzed the association networks constructed from a publicly available array of 113 serum metabolites measured on a cohort of 234 subjects from three groups (66 CRC patients, 76 patients with polyposis, and 92 healthy controls), which concentrations were obtained via targeted liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. In terms of architecture, topology, and connectivity, the metabolite-metabolite association network of CRC patients appears to be completely different with respect to patients with polyposis and healthy controls. The most relevant nodes in the CRC network are those related to energy metabolism. Interestingly, phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan metabolism are found to be involved in both CRC and polyposis. Our results demonstrate that the characterization of metabolite-metabolite association networks is a promising and powerful tool to investigate molecular aspects of CRC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据