4.7 Article

Thermally integrated pumped thermal energy storage for multi-energy districts: Integrated modelling, assessment and comparison with batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2023.106734

关键词

Thermally integrated pumped thermal; electricity storage (TIPTES); Multi -energy storage; High -temperature heat pump (HTHP); Organic Rankine cycle (ORC); Carnot batteries; Power-to-heat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the performance of multi-energy storage based on the Thermally Integrated Pumped Energy Storage (TIPTES) technology. The results show that TIPTES performs better than lithium-ion batteries in terms of thermodynamic efficiency and reduction of curtailed renewables. However, the high capital cost of TIPTES currently makes it financially unfeasible.
Integrating large shares of renewables into energy systems requires energy storage technologies able to efficiently dispatch and convert different energy vectors at a local level (multi-energy storage). The paper investigates the performance of multi-energy storage based on the Thermally Integrated Pumped Energy Storage (TIPTES) technology. TIPTES stores electric energy as thermal exergy at temperatures higher or lower than the environment but also exploits additional low-temperature thermal sources, commonly from renewables or waste heat recovery, to boost the charging or discharging phases. In the paper, two different multi-energy TIPTES (mTIPTES) systems are modelled and simulated in three residential case studies where electric and thermal vectors are present, together with solar electric and thermal production. The mTIPTES annual operation is optimised via mixed-integer linear programming, linearising the operating characteristics of mTIPTES components (heat pumps, chillers, organic Rankine cycles and thermal energy storage). Finally, mTIPTES was compared against lithium-ion batteries, a benchmark for residential energy storage. The comparison is based on thermodynamic and economic figures, with the mTIPTES capital cost estimated based on cost models from the literature. The results showed that mTIPTES perform better than the battery from a thermodynamic point of view, reducing the curtailment of renewables. In economic terms, for large penetrations of renewables, this translated into an operating cost reduction of up to around 15 % compared to a system without storage, which is five percentage points lower than what was achieved with batteries. Similar results were found for CO2 emissions and primary energy consumption, for which reductions larger than batteries and up to 20 %, compared to a case without storage, can be found. Despite the operating cost reduction, the mTIPTES total annualised cost (including capital costs) is around double compared to BES, and, for the investigated configurations, mTIPTES could not achieve financial feasibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据