4.7 Article

Predictive operations of marine pumped hydro-storage towards real time offshore wind-wave power complementarity: An event-triggered MPC approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 62, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.106583

关键词

Offshore wind energy; Wave power; Marine pumped hydro-storage; Power complementarity control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an event-triggered model predictive control (MPC) approach for marine pumped hydro-electric storage (MPHS) to achieve real-time offshore wind-wave power complementarity in an integrated offshore renewable energies (OREs) and MPHS system. The approach includes a deep learning wind-wave power predictor for ultra-short term power forecasting of the OREs and a real-time nonlinear explicit MPC method for controlling the MPHS to compensate for power oscillations from the OREs. The proposed approach is demonstrated through a case study and achieves high accuracy in meeting load demand.
This paper explores an event-triggered model predictive control (MPC) approach for marine pumped hydro-electric storage (MPHS) to achieve the real time offshore wind-wave power complementarity in an integrated offshore renewable energies (OREs) and MPHS system. A deep learning wind-wave power predictor is proposed for ultra-short term power forecasting of the OREs based on feature extraction and fusion. Then, a real time nonlinear explicit MPC method is proposed based on an explicit model for controlling the MPHS such that the power oscillations from the OREs can be compensated timely. The stability of the real time MPC is proved and an event-triggered scheme is designed such that a good balance between the dynamic performance and regulation burden of the MPHs can be achieved. The proposed approach is demonstrated through a case study and the results indicate that the MPHS can be controlled to handle the OREs uncertainties timely and hence can meet the load demand with high accuracy (>97 %) by using the proposed control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据