4.7 Article

Performance improvement of combined cycle power plant with combined ice slurry thermal energy storage cooling and adsorption cooling

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2023.106779

关键词

Combined cycle power plant; Ice slurry; Thermal energy storage; Adsorption cooling system; Power output

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A combined cooling system of adsorption cooling system and ice slurry thermal energy storage is proposed to improve the performance and power output of a conventional combined cycle power plant (CCPP). A simplified model is developed to predict the CCPP power output under different inlet air temperatures, which is verified with practical operational data. The power outputs and economic analyses of CCPP-CombC with different cooling energy storage scales are evaluated. For the present CCPP, AdCS with a maximum cooling capacity of 6000 kW and ISTES with 600 GJ of cooling energy storage completely cover the cooling demand of the CCPP. The net profit of the CCPP-CombC increases first and then decreases, with the maximum net profit appearing when the cooling energy storage is 500 GJ.
To increase the performance and power output of the conventional combined cycle power plant (CCPP), a combined cooling system (CombC) of adsorption cooling system (AdCS) and ice slurry thermal energy storage (ISTES) is proposed for CCPP inlet air cooling. A simplified model for CCPP power output prediction under different inlet air temperatures is developed, and it is verified through practical operational data. The power outputs and economic analyses of CCPP-CombC with different cooling energy storage scales are evaluated. For the present CCPP, AdCS with a maximum cooling capacity of 6000 kW and ISTES with 600 GJ of cooling energy storage completely cover the cooling demand of the CCPP. The daily electricity increment increases as the cooling energy storage scale increases, but with a declining growth rate. The net profit of the CCPP-CombC increases first and then decreases, and the maximum net profit appears when the cooling energy storage is 500 GJ, and it is 82.7 % and 17.0 % higher than the net profit when the cooling energy storage is 200 GJ and 600 GJ, respectively. Cost recovery occurs within 1 year of installing the combined cooling system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据