4.6 Article

The cyclic peptide G4CP2 enables the modulation of galactose metabolism in yeast by interfering with GAL4 transcriptional activity

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MOLECULAR BIOSCIENCES
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1017757

关键词

GAL4; cyclic peptide; combinatorial library; yeast two-hybrid; protein interference; galactose metabolism; drug discovery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetically-encoded combinatorial peptide libraries are useful for identifying peptides with potential therapeutic applications. In this study, a cyclic peptide called G4CP2 was identified and characterized. G4CP2 interferes with the function of GAL4 protein, a transcription factor involved in galactose metabolism in yeast. The results demonstrate the potential biotechnological applications of G4CP2 and the utility of CYCLIC as a tool for peptide identification.
Genetically-encoded combinatorial peptide libraries are convenient tools to identify peptides to be used as therapeutics, antimicrobials and functional synthetic biology modules. Here, we report the identification and characterization of a cyclic peptide, G4CP2, that interferes with the GAL4 protein, a transcription factor responsible for the activation of galactose catabolism in yeast and widely exploited in molecular biology. G4CP2 was identified by screening CYCLIC, a Yeast Two-Hybrid-based combinatorial library of cyclic peptides developed in our laboratory. G4CP2 interferes with GAL4-mediated activation of galactose metabolic enzymes both when expressed intracellularly, as a recombinant peptide, and when provided exogenously, as a chemically-synthesized cyclic peptide. Our results support the application of G4CP2 in microbial biotechnology and, additionally, demonstrate that CYCLIC can be used as a tool for the rapid identification of peptides, virtually without any limitations with respect to the target protein. The possible biotechnological applications of cyclic peptides are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据