4.7 Article

Curcumin Administration Improves Force of mdx Dystrophic Diaphragm by Acting on Fiber-Type Composition, Myosin Nitrotyrosination and SERCA1 Protein Levels

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antiox12061181

关键词

curcumin; muscle dystrophy; nNOS; nitrotyrosine; nitrosative stress; oxidative stress; SERCA; AMPK; myotube culture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Curcumin administration has beneficial effects on dystrophic muscle by improving myofiber maturation, increasing muscle fiber types, enhancing muscle strength, reducing oxidative damage, and regulating nNOS activity.
The vegetal polyphenol curcumin displays beneficial effects against skeletal muscle derangement induced by oxidative stress, disuse or aging. Since oxidative stress and inflammation are involved in the progression of muscle dystrophy, the effects of curcumin administration were investigated in the diaphragm of mdx mice injected intraperitoneally or subcutaneously with curcumin for 4-12-24 weeks. Curcumin treatment independently of the way and duration of administration (i) ameliorated myofiber maturation index without affecting myofiber necrosis, inflammation and degree of fibrosis; (ii) counteracted the decrease in type 2X and 2B fiber percentage; (iii) increased about 30% both twitch and tetanic tensions of diaphragm strips; (iv) reduced myosin nitrotyrosination and tropomyosin oxidation; (v) acted on two opposite nNOS regulators by decreasing active AMP-Kinase and increasing SERCA1 protein levels, the latter effect being detectable also in myotube cultures from mdx satellite cells. Interestingly, increased contractility, decreased myosin nitrotyrosination and SERCA1 upregulation were also detectable in the mdx diaphragm after a 4-week administration of the NOS inhibitor 7-Nitroindazole, and were not improved further by a combined treatment. In conclusion, curcumin has beneficial effects on the dystrophic muscle, mechanistically acting for the containment of a deregulated nNOS activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据